Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [1953] EACA 50

Afumu and Another v Regina

Afumu and Another v Regina (Criminal Appeals Nos. 625 and 626 of 1953) [1953] EACA 50 (1 January 1953)

The court held that evidence taken in the absence of an accused, without dispensation of attendance, made the second appellant’s trial illegal.

  • Absence Of Accused
  • Trial Irregularity
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Role Of Advocate
  • Magistrate Discretion
  • Absence-of-accused
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1953] EACA 1

Afumu and Another v Regina

Afumu and Another v Regina (Criminal Appeal No. 625 of 1953; Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 1953) [1953] EACA 1 (1 January 1953)

The court held that trying the second appellant in his absence was illegal, allowed his appeal, and reduced the first appellant’s sentence.

  • Absence Of Accused
  • Trial Irregularity
  • Sentencing Enhancement
  • Role Of Advocate
  • Magistrate Discretion
  • Absence-of-accused
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1943] EACA 72

Crown v Kamuhu and Another (Confirmation Case No. 151 of .1943)

Crown v Kamuhu and Another (Confirmation Case No. 151 of .1943) [1943] EACA 72 (1 January 1943)

The court held that a magistrate has discretion to allow withdrawal of a guilty plea before sentence, and set aside proceedings for misdirection.

  • Plea Of Guilty
  • Withdrawal Of Plea
  • Magistrate Discretion
  • Criminal-law
  • Guilty-plea
  • Withdrawal-of-plea
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1936] EACA 134

Rex v Dad (Cr. Rev. Case No. 35/1936)

Rex v Dad (Cr. Rev. Case No. 35/1936) [1936] EACA 134 (1 January 1936)

The court held that a magistrate in committal proceedings is entitled to weigh the evidence and is not bound to commit for trial solely because there is evidence which, if believed, would support a conviction. The guiding principle is that if the magistrate is of the opinion that the effect of the evidence is such that it ought not reasonably to satisfy the trial court of the accused's guilt, he should dismiss the charge. In this case, the magistrate found the evidence insufficient to establish culpable negligence and refused to commit the accused for trial. The High Court found no reason to…

  • Committal Proceedings
  • Magistrate Discretion
  • Weighing Evidence
  • Manslaughter
  • Culpable Negligence
Read case analysis
Employment And Labour [1931] EACA 26

Rex v Haq (Cr. App. 40/1931.)

Rex v Haq (Cr. App. 40/1931.) [1931] EACA 26 (1 January 1931)

The Court of Appeal quashed a conviction over a taxi driver’s wage claim, holding the magistrate should have used section 44 to refer the dispute to civil proceedings.

  • Employment Of Natives Ordinance
  • Definition Of Servant
  • Magistrate Discretion
  • Wage Claims
  • Civil Vs Criminal Proceedings
  • Employment-law
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.