Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Okitela Joseph v Opoli Patrick (Civil Appeal No.14O of 2013) [2025] UGCA 245 (21 July 2025)
Second appeal struck out as incompetent because the grounds were vague and factual, contrary to the rules and limits on second appeals.
Byoleko Robert Mutazindwa and Another v Rehema Turyakira Omar (Miscellaneous Application No. 1188 of 2025) [2025] UGHCLD 137 (14 July 2025)
The High Court granted a stay of execution pending appeal, finding the applicants had standing when filed, faced imminent execution, and would risk substantial loss.
The Omukama of Tooro v Kagoro (HCT-01-LD-CR-0006-2017) [2025] UGHC 523 (14 July 2025)
The High Court refused to review its earlier revision ruling, holding that the alleged misapplication of authority and underlying illegality were not errors apparent on the record.
Erick Kiggundu v Teddy Kyeyune Kaddu (Civil Application No. 372 of 2024) [2025] UGCA 227 (11 July 2025)
The Court of Appeal dismissed an application for stay of execution pending appeal, finding the applicant failed to show substantial loss because execution had already been completed.
Korukiiko Annet v Tibashemererwa Beatrice and Another (Civil Revision 39 of 2022) [2025] UGHC 462 (30 June 2025)
The High Court partly revised a magistrate’s ruling, upholding dismissal for lack of locus standi but quashing revocation of letters of administration made without a hearing.
Namale Shamim v Nataliya Nabbimba (Miscellaneous Appeal No. 944 of 2025) [2025] UGHCLD 123 (26 June 2025)
The High Court allowed an appeal against a temporary injunction, finding unresolved name discrepancies meant the respondent had not established locus standi.
Namutebi Peninah v James Kibombo and Others (Civil Suit No. 7 of 2020) [2025] UGHCFD 36 (26 June 2025)
The High Court dismissed a land suit for lack of locus standi and no cause of action, finding the plaintiff had no proven proprietary interest in the estate land.
Registered Trustees of South Rwenzori Diocese v Kabukero Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd (Civil Appeal No. 254 of 2018) [2025] UGCA 213 (25 June 2025)
The Court of Appeal held that the respondent lacked locus standi because it was not in legal existence when the cause of action arose, and allowed the appeal with costs.
Exim Bank (Uganda) Ltd v Westwinds Trading C.O Matco Ltd (Misc. Application No. 251 of 2025) [2025] UGCommC 182 (24 June 2025)
The High Court dismissed Exim Bank’s application for security for costs, finding no proof that Westwinds Trading could not meet any costs order.
Sentongo Abdulnoor Kyamundu and Others v Justice Forum (JEEMA) and Others (Miscellaneous Cause No. 93 of 2025) [2025] UGHCCD 75 (20 June 2025)
The court found that the facts giving rise to the application first arose on 8th October 2020, and the application for judicial review should have been filed within three months from that date. Although the law allows the court to extend the time for filing upon application and demonstration of good reason, the applicants made no effort to seek such enlargement or provide justification for the delay. Consequently, the application was filed out of time and could not be entertained. The court dismissed the application with costs to the respondents, declining to consider the remaining issues.
Source excerpt
