Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Employment And Labour [2019] UGHC 70

Ojok & 4 Others v Gulu Municipal Council & Another

Ojok & 4 Others v Gulu Municipal Council & Another (Civil Suit No. 32 of 2006) [2019] UGHC 70 (27 November 2019)

The High Court held that local government bodies lacked power to appoint the plaintiffs to teaching posts, so the alleged employment contracts were ultra vires and unenforceable.

  • Local Government Employment
  • Ultra Vires Contracts
  • Ostensible Authority
  • Illegal Contracts
  • Remedies For Unlawful Contracts
  • Ultra-vires-contracts
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2016] UGCA 85

Byamukama Vs Uganda

Byamukama Vs Uganda (Criminal Appeal No.316 of 2009) [2016] UGCA 85 (6 December 2016)

The High Court upheld Byamukama Jackson’s conviction for abuse of office, finding he arbitrarily awarded fuel supply to a non-prequalified supplier.

  • Abuse Of Office
  • Public Procurement
  • Local Government Employment
  • Arbitrary Action
  • Authority Of Public Officer
  • Abuse-of-office
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2015] UGHCACD 11

Byamukama v Uganda (HCT-00-CN 19 of 2014)

Byamukama v Uganda (HCT-00-CN 19 of 2014) [2015] UGHCACD 11 (18 June 2015)

The High Court upheld Byamukama Jackson’s conviction for abuse of office, finding he arbitrarily awarded a fuel contract to a non-prequalified supplier.

  • Abuse Of Office
  • Public Procurement Irregularities
  • Local Government Employment
  • Arbitrary Exercise Of Authority
  • Abuse-of-office
  • Public-procurement
Read case analysis
Administrative Law [2014] UGCA 97

Akayo v Kamuli District Local Council

Akayo v Kamuli District Local Council (Civil Appeal No. 08 of 2011) [2014] UGCA 97 (23 July 2014)

The Court of Appeal held that the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) acted ultra vires his powers by interdicting the appellant without a submission from the District Council, as required by Section 55(4) of the Local Governments Act. The District Service Commission (DSC) also acted unlawfully by dismissing the appellant based on a submission from the CAO rather than the District Council. The trial judge erred in law by failing to properly interpret and apply the mandatory provisions of the Local Governments Act and the Constitution, which require democratic participation and fair treatment i…

  • Judicial Review
  • Disciplinary Control
  • Local Government Employment
  • Interdiction Procedure
  • Reinstatement Of Public Officers
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.