Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Equator Touring Services Limited v Kampala Capital City Authority (Civil Appeal 119 of 2014) [2024] UGCA 212 (15 August 2024)
The Court of Appeal upheld a finding that the market-management contract was void for non-compliance with procurement law and dismissed the appeal.
Mbale District Local Government v Samuel Wegoye Advocates (Miscellaneous Application 9 of 2024) [2024] UGHC 257 (3 May 2024)
The High Court at Mbale set aside a consent judgment after finding mistake in the amount agreed and that local government officials lacked authority without Attorney General clearance.
Abasamia Hwolerane Association Limited v Jinja City Council (Application No. 12 of 2021) [2021] UGPPDPAAT 15 (23 August 2021)
The Tribunal found that Rojoke Photo Lab & Art Co. Ltd and Rojoke Photo Lab and Art, both controlled by Okiria James, submitted bids for more than one item in category 'A', constituting a conflict of interest under the procurement rules and rendering Rojoke Photo Lab & Art Co. Ltd ineligible for the contract. The initial notice of best evaluated bidder erroneously named Rojoke Photo Lab and Art at a higher commission rate, but this was a correctable administrative error. The Tribunal determined that the Applicant's alleged unsatisfactory performance was not substantiated by the evaluation rep…
Source excerpt
Messrs Sendege Senyondo & Co Advocates v Kampala Capital City Authority (Civil Suit No. 147 of 2016) [2017] UGCommC 22 (3 March 2017)
The court held that the agreement dated 11th October 1996 was enforceable as it provided for remuneration according to statutory scales, not as a gross sum or salary, and thus was not subject to Section 51 of the Advocates Act. For claims after 1st January 2006, the court found that non-compliance with public procurement laws was the responsibility of the Defendant's officials, not the Plaintiff, and that the Plaintiff, having rendered services upon written instructions and to the Defendant's benefit, was entitled to payment under quantum meruit. The court rejected the Defendant's attempt to…
Source excerpt
Engineer Investiments Ltd v Attorney General & Anor (HCCS 331 of 2012) [2015] UGCommC 175 (15 December 2015)
The High Court overruled a preliminary objection based on Article 119(5), holding it did not apply to a local government contract, but left procurement compliance for evidence.
Pal agencies (u) Ltd v Soroti Municipal Council & anor (Civil Suit No. 351 of 2009.) [2015] UGHCCD 68 (20 August 2015)
The High Court held that an enforceable contract existed between Pal Agencies and Soroti Municipal Council, but found no breach and ordered Pal Agencies to pay UGX 119,000,000 on the counterclaim.
Chogm Tour Agents 2007 (U) Ltd v Masaka Municipal Council Local Government (Civil Appeal 7 of 2010) [2010] UGSC 34 (25 January 2010)
The Supreme Court held that the respondent and PPDA did not contravene the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act or its Regulations in handling the complaint from Equator Touring Services Ltd, as the complaint was first submitted in writing to the Town Clerk, the accounting officer, and only escalated to PPDA after the Town Clerk failed to resolve the issue. The meeting of 22-09-2008 was properly convened by the Executive Director of PPDA, who is empowered to manage day-to-day operations, and the recommendations made were within the legal mandate. The extension of Equator Touri…
Source excerpt
