Rex v Jiwa (Criminal Appeal No. 177 of 1948) [1949] EACA 24 (1 January 1949)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 177 of 1948
Judge
Edwards CJ, Graham Paul CJ, Thacker J
The Court held that genuine police spies are not accomplices and do not need corroboration. It dismissed Hasham Jiwa’s appeal against convictions on liquor and rationing offences.
Rex v Habib (Confirmation, Case No. 1018 of 1947) [1947] EACA 59 (1 January 1947)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Confirmation, Case No. 1018 of 1947
Judges
Coffey AgJ, Nihill, C.J
The court held that the Magistrate was required by law to impose a minimum fine of ÂŁ75 for a second conviction under section 44 of the Liquor Ordinance, 1934, and substituted this amount for the lower fine imposed. The court further held that the Magistrate had no authority to order the destruction of the revolver under the Arms and Ammunition Ordinance, 1925, and that only forfeiture to the Crown was permissible. The court declined to make an order for payment of fines by instalments in confirmation proceedings but directed the Magistrate to hear an application from the accused on this issue.
Rex v Mall (Criminal Appeal No. 208 91 1943.) [1944] EACA 6 (1 January 1944)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 208 91 1943.
Judge
Bartley J, Sheridan CJ
The court upheld a conviction for supplying natives with methylated spirits, but set aside a separate conviction for selling methylated spirits without a licence.
Rex v Imam (Cr. R. 82/1933.) [1933] EACA 25 (1 January 1933)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Cr. R. 82/1933.
Judge
Barth, C.J (Kenya), Gamble. Ag. J. (Kenya)
The court upheld a conviction for possession of intoxicating liquor but held that a fine could not replace the imprisonment prescribed by the Liquor Ordinance.