Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [1949] EACA 24

Rex v Jiwa

Rex v Jiwa (Criminal Appeal No. 177 of 1948) [1949] EACA 24 (1 January 1949)

The Court held that genuine police spies are not accomplices and do not need corroboration. It dismissed Hasham Jiwa’s appeal against convictions on liquor and rationing offences.

  • Accomplice Evidence
  • Police Spy Exception
  • Corroboration Requirement
  • Liquor Offences
  • Rationed Goods Offences
  • Invoice Requirement
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1947] EACA 59

Rex v Habib (Confirmation, Case No. 1018 of 1947)

Rex v Habib (Confirmation, Case No. 1018 of 1947) [1947] EACA 59 (1 January 1947)

The court held that the Magistrate was required by law to impose a minimum fine of ÂŁ75 for a second conviction under section 44 of the Liquor Ordinance, 1934, and substituted this amount for the lower fine imposed. The court further held that the Magistrate had no authority to order the destruction of the revolver under the Arms and Ammunition Ordinance, 1925, and that only forfeiture to the Crown was permissible. The court declined to make an order for payment of fines by instalments in confirmation proceedings but directed the Magistrate to hear an application from the accused on this issue.

  • Liquor Offences
  • Repeat Offender Penalties
  • Arms And Ammunition Offences
  • Sentencing
  • Forfeiture Of Property
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1944] EACA 6

Rex v Mall

Rex v Mall (Criminal Appeal No. 208 91 1943.) [1944] EACA 6 (1 January 1944)

The court upheld a conviction for supplying natives with methylated spirits, but set aside a separate conviction for selling methylated spirits without a licence.

  • Liquor Offences
  • Licensing Requirements
  • Methylated Spirits
  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Liquor-offences
  • Licensing-requirements
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1933] EACA 25

Rex v Imam (Cr. R. 82/1933.)

Rex v Imam (Cr. R. 82/1933.) [1933] EACA 25 (1 January 1933)

The court upheld a conviction for possession of intoxicating liquor but held that a fine could not replace the imprisonment prescribed by the Liquor Ordinance.

  • Sentencing Powers
  • Statutory Interpretation
  • Liquor Offences
  • Sentencing-powers
  • Statutory-interpretation
  • Liquor-offences
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.