Ssembatya vbKisekka
Ssembatya vbKisekka (Miscellaneous Application 1101 of 2022) [2024] UGHCLD 276 (29 November 2024)
The court found that the respondent, by his own prior admissions and lack of contrary evidence, is a beneficiary of the late Sekyaya Muhammed and thus has capacity to be substituted as legal representative for the purposes of execution in Civil Suit No. 331 of 2009. Although the respondent does not hold letters of administration, the court invoked Section 222 of the Succession Act to grant him limited letters of administration for the suit. The court further held that the applicants, having been declared rightful owners of the suit land (subject to 0.15 acres of kibanja interest), are entitle…
Source excerpt
- Substitution Of Parties
- Eviction Orders
- Legal Representative Status
- Execution Of Judgments