Patel v Othwele (Civil suit No. 103 of 1954) [1955] EACA 7 (1 January 1955)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Civil suit No. 103 of 1954
Judge
Windham J
The court held that although the plaintiff's reply and defence to counterclaim were filed out of time and without an application for extension, the defence to counterclaim disclosed a substantial defence going to the root of the counterclaim. Order IX, rule 9 (2) is discretionary, not mandatory, and the court should not enter ex parte judgment where a defence of substance is present, even if filed late. Instead, the court should admit the late pleading and allow the case to be tried on its merits, thereby avoiding unnecessary procedural delays. However, since the respondent was granted indulg…
Patel v Othwele (Civil Suit No. 103 of 1954) [1955] EACA 27 (1 January 1955)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Civil Suit No. 103 of 1954
Judge
Windham J
The court admitted a late defence to counterclaim because it disclosed a substantial defence, refused ex parte judgment, and made no order as to costs.