Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Nassolo & 4 Others v Engola & 5 Others (Miscellaneous Application 2470 of 2024) [2025] UGHCLD 28 (14 February 2025)
The High Court found the respondents in contempt for failing to comply with a land title rectification order and fined them UGX 2,000,000.
Ssali and 4 Others v Kagara and 4 Others (Civil Miscellaneous Application 17 of 2024) [2024] UGHC 1162 (20 December 2024)
The High Court partly allowed a review application, recognizing the applicants’ retention of 303 acres, but refused review of damages, costs, interest, and stay.
Edhiruma v The Registered Trustees of Lohana (EA) Education Trust & 4 Others (Civil Suit 45 of 2019) [2024] UGHC 251 (7 March 2024)
The Plaintiff lawfully purchased the suit land, paid the full purchase price, and has been in continuous possession and development of the property since 2004. The mortgages registered on the title in favour of the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Defendants are either fully satisfied or extinguished by operation of the law of limitation, as no action was taken to enforce them for over 36 years. The refusal by the Commissioner Land Registration to transfer the title into the Plaintiff's name and the subsequent cancellation of his registration were unlawful, as they did not comply with the mandatory statutor…
Source excerpt
Ssekubwa v Commissioner Land Registration & Ors (Misc. Application No. 223 of 2019) [2020] UGHCLD 21 (9 November 2020)
The High Court found the Land Registration Commissioner in contempt for failing to implement a valid consent decree over land at Makerere, and granted restoration and cancellation orders.
Daaka Nganwa v Rukyema & Anor (HCT -05) [2012] UGHC 241 (16 November 2012)
The High Court dismissed an appeal over a land dispute, upholding rectification of title after finding fraud and deeming the counterclaim admitted.
Byaruhanga v Tibaijuka (Civil Suit No.156 of 2008) [2009] UGHC 191 (25 August 2009)
The High Court revoked letters of administration issued to the defendant, ordered new letters to the plaintiff, rectified the land title, and granted a permanent injunction.
Popina General Supplies & 2 Ors v Stanbic Bank of Uganda Limited [2015] UGSC 125 (16 October 2015)
The court found that the applicants had established a prima facie case regarding the property of the 2nd applicant, as the pleadings raised serious issues meriting trial and there was no rebuttal of the existence of the loan facility or the sale of the suit land by the 1st respondent. However, the court noted that the property belonging to the 3rd applicant had already been transferred to the 4th respondent, making the grant of an injunction in respect of that property futile. The court held that temporary injunctions are discretionary and should not be granted in vain. The court allowed the…
Source excerpt
