Kihanga and 5 Others v Nalweyiso and 3 Others
Kihanga and 5 Others v Nalweyiso and 3 Others (Miscellaneous Application 9 of 2020) [2022] UGHCLD 304 (13 April 2022)
The court found that while a valid court order existed granting both the applicants and the 1st respondent rights to utilize the suit land, the applicants failed to prove that the respondents, other than the 1st respondent, were aware of the order or disobeyed it. The 1st respondent was found to be acting within the scope of the court order by utilizing the 3.5 acres decreed to her. There was no evidence of contempt by any respondent, as the order had not been varied or discharged and the applicants did not demonstrate disobedience. Consequently, the application for contempt was dismissed, an…
Source excerpt
- Contempt Of Court
- Execution Of Judgments
- Land Occupation Rights
- Damages For Property Destruction