Wankuma v Uganda
Wankuma v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 4 of 2022) [2025] UGCA 35 (13 February 2025)
The Court of Appeal held that the appellant, having pleaded guilty and confirmed the facts—including his age (19) and the victim's age (13)—could not challenge the conviction or the factual findings regarding age. The only permissible ground of appeal was the legality of the sentence. The trial judge erred by failing to arithmetically deduct the period spent on remand from the sentence, as required by Article 23(8) of the Constitution and the Supreme Court's decision in Rwabugande v Uganda. The sentence imposed was therefore illegal to the extent that it did not specifically credit the remand…
Source excerpt
- Aggravated Defilement
- Sentencing Principles
- Remand Period Deduction
- Juvenile Justice
- Plea Of Guilty