Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2012] UGHC 419

Muteteri v Bamudali

Muteteri v Bamudali (Civil Misc. Application No. 138 of 2011) [2012] UGHC 419 (24 February 2012)

The High Court rejected a bid to revise an LC1 decision, holding that the lower court had jurisdiction over a trespass dispute and upheld execution.

  • Revision Of Lower Court Decisions
  • Jurisdiction Of Lc Courts
  • Trespass To Land
  • Revision-of-lower-court-decisions
  • Jurisdiction-of-lc-courts
  • Trespass-to-land
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2002] UGHCLD 2

G.W Sembatya v Nandaula & 2 Others

G.W Sembatya v Nandaula & 2 Others (Civil Suit 918 of 2000) [2002] UGHCLD 2 (13 March 2002)

The court found that the LC court in 1998 had jurisdiction to determine the customary land dispute between the plaintiff and the late Namirembe. The substance of the present suit—ownership of the kibanja—was the same as that previously litigated. The current defendants are privies of Namirembe, being her daughter and grandchildren, and the plaintiff is effectively seeking to relitigate the same matter. Applying section 7 of the Civil Procedure Act and the test in Kamunye v Pioneer Assurance Ltd, the court held that the suit is barred by res judicata. As a result, the preliminary objection suc…

  • Res Judicata
  • Jurisdiction Of Lc Courts
  • Land Ownership Disputes
  • Preliminary Objection
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2000] UGHC 32

Lugazi Progressive & Another v Sserunjogi & 4 oers (Misc.App. No.50 Of 2000) (Misc.App. No.50 of 2000)

Lugazi Progressive & Another v Sserunjogi & 4 oers (Misc.App. No.50 Of 2000) (Misc.App. No.50 of 2000) [2000] UGHC 32 (28 December 2000)

The court held that Rule 8 of the Commissioner for Oaths Rules is procedural and relates only to exhibits produced and exhibited to a court during trial or hearing, not to annextures attached to affidavits. The omission to verify annextures does not render the affidavit incompetent; at most, the annextures themselves may be rejected. The Court of Appeal's decision in Uganda Corporation Creameries Ltd. & Henry Kawalya vs. Reamation Ltd. is binding and must be followed. Regarding the alleged falsehood, the court found that the question of ownership of the disputed land is a substantive issue fo…

  • Affidavit Verification
  • Preliminary Objections
  • Jurisdiction Of Lc Courts
  • Land Allocation Disputes
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.