Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Austrian Committee Against Torture v Burundi (Communication 26 of 1989) [2018] ACHPR 14 (7 September 2018)
The African Commission held that a communication against Burundi was inadmissible because Burundi was not a party to the African Charter at the time.
Eugene v USA and Anor (Communication 37 of 1990) [1990] ACHPR 6 (28 April 1990)
The African Commission declared a communication inadmissible because it was directed against states not party to the African Charter.
Parish v Indonesia (Communication 38 of 1990) [1990] ACHPR 8 (28 April 1990)
The African Commission declared the communication against Indonesia inadmissible because Indonesia was not a party to the African Charter.
Association Internationale Des Jurists Democrates v Ethiopia (Communication 28 of 1989) [1989] ACHPR 5 (4 November 1989)
The African Commission declared inadmissible a communication against Ethiopia because Ethiopia was not a party to the African Charter.
Austrian Committee Against Torture v Morocco (Communication 20 of 1988) [1989] ACHPR 4 (4 November 1989)
The African Commission found a communication inadmissible because it was brought against Morocco, which was not a party to the African Charter.
International PEN v Malawi and Others (Communication 19 of 1988) [1989] ACHPR 8 (4 November 1989)
The African Commission declared International PEN’s communication inadmissible because it was directed against states that were not parties to the Charter.
Union National De Liberation De Cabinda v Angola (Communication 24 of 1989) [1989] ACHPR 2 (14 April 1989)
The African Commission declared inadmissible a communication by the Union National De Liberation de Cabinda against Angola because Angola was not a party to the Charter.
Abebe v Ethiopia (Communication 10 of 1988) [1988] ACHPR 2 (26 October 1988)
The African Commission held that the communication was inadmissible because it was directed against a State not party to the African Charter.
Ihebereme v USA (Communication 2 of 1988) [1988] ACHPR 13 (26 October 1988)
The African Commission declared inadmissible a communication alleging false imprisonment and police brutality because the respondent, the USA, was not a party to the African Charter.
Ntaka v Lesotho (Communication 33 of 1989) [1988] ACHPR 18 (26 October 1988)
The African Commission held that a communication against Lesotho was inadmissible because Lesotho was not yet a party to the African Charter.
