Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Constitutional Law [2019] AfCHPR 37

Ndagijimana v Tanzania (Application No. 024/2019)

Ndagijimana v Tanzania (Application No. 024/2019) [2019] AfCHPR 37 (26 September 2019)

The African Court dismissed Jean de Dieu Ndajigimana’s request for provisional measures as moot after confirming that he had already been released to Rwanda.

  • Provisional Measures
  • Arbitrary Detention
  • Right To Liberty
  • International Human Rights Obligations
  • Provisional-measures
  • Mootness
Read case analysis
Constitutional Law [2011] ACHPR 89

Echaria v Kenya (Communication 375 of 2009)

Echaria v Kenya (Communication 375 of 2009) [2011] ACHPR 89 (5 November 2011)

The African Commission found that the applicant had exhausted all mandatory local remedies by pursuing her case to the Kenyan Court of Appeal, the highest judicial authority. Discretionary remedies such as review applications and quasi-judicial avenues were not required to be exhausted. However, the Commission determined that the thirty-one month delay between exhaustion of local remedies and submission of the communication was unreasonable, as no compelling explanation was provided for the delay. The Commission held that, in the absence of a prescribed period in the African Charter, reasonab…

  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
  • Gender Discrimination
  • Admissibility Requirements
  • International Human Rights Obligations
Read case analysis
Public International Law [2011] ACHPR 93

Zitha and Another v Republic of Mozambique (Communication 361 of 2008)

Zitha and Another v Republic of Mozambique (Communication 361 of 2008) [2011] ACHPR 93 (3 March 2011)

The African Commission determined that enforced disappearance is a continuing violation, thus establishing its competence ratione temporis to consider the communication. However, the Commission found that the applicants did not sufficiently attempt to exhaust available judicial remedies in Mozambique, as required by Article 56(5) of the African Charter. The measures taken by the second victim, such as contacting political figures and international organizations, did not constitute judicial or institutionalized administrative remedies. Furthermore, the Commission held that the communication wa…

  • Enforced Disappearance
  • Admissibility Requirements
  • Continuing Violation
  • Exhaustion Of Local Remedies
  • International Human Rights Obligations
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.