Mukasa & 9 Others v Mukasa & Another
Mukasa & 9 Others v Mukasa & Another (Civil Suits 190 of 2018 & 209 of 2022) [2025] UGHCFD 10 (17 March 2025)
The court found that the Defendants failed in their duty as administrators by not distributing the bibanja at Bugulo as required by the Will and Sharia law, and by failing to file an inventory within the statutory period or seek extension. The inventory was filed out of time and without leave of court, constituting just cause for revocation of probate. The Defendants also failed to remit proceeds from the sale of Hasifa Nakirya Mukasa's beneficial share, warranting a refund. The Plaintiffs, particularly Sarah Nattembo, were found to have intermeddled in the estate by collecting rent without p…
Source excerpt
- Probate Revocation
- Estate Administration
- Will Execution
- Intermeddling In Estate
- Distribution Of Estate Property
- Beneficiary Rights