Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2004] UGCA 44

National Insurance Corporation v Span International Ltd

National Insurance Corporation v Span International Ltd (CIVIL APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2002) [2004] UGCA 44 (28 April 2004)

The Court of Appeal held that the suit was not time barred because the appellant's conduct—engaging in prolonged negotiations and reconsideration of the claim—constituted a waiver of the strict twelve-month limitation period in the insurance policy. The limitation period only began to run after the final rejection of the claim in June 1998, making the suit filed in January 1999 timely. The court affirmed that the respondent had an insurable interest in the machines by virtue of lawful possession and use, even though it was not the owner. The court found no evidence of breach of utmost good fa…

  • Insurance Contracts
  • Insurable Interest
  • Limitation Periods
  • Damages Assessment
  • Good Faith In Contracts
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1952] EACA 283

Wilson Limited v Queensland Insurance Company Limited

Wilson Limited v Queensland Insurance Company Limited (Civil Case No.,192 of 1951 (Mombasa)) [1952] EACA 283 (1 January 1952)

Marine insurance dispute over a quotation for tiles shipment to Mombasa. The court held the contract was invalid for lack of a sea policy and dismissed the suit.

  • Marine Insurance
  • Insurable Interest
  • Material Non Disclosure
  • Contract Validity
  • Marine-insurance
  • Insurable-interest
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1932] EACA 46

Said and Another v South British Insurance Comapany Ltd (C.C. 85/1931 (Mombasa).)

Said and Another v South British Insurance Comapany Ltd (C.C. 85/1931 (Mombasa).) [1932] EACA 46 (1 January 1932)

In a joint motor-car insurance policy, the court found the hirer had deliberately set the car on fire and could not recover, but the owner could recover to the extent of his insurable interest.

  • Insurance Contracts
  • Hire Purchase
  • Insurable Interest
  • Arson
  • Joint Policy Liability
  • Insurance-contracts
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.