Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2024] UGSC 6

CTM Uganda Limited & 2 Others v Alimuss Properties Uganda Limited & 3 Others

CTM Uganda Limited & 2 Others v Alimuss Properties Uganda Limited & 3 Others [2024] UGSC 6 (29 January 2024)

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal challenging a consent judgment and company name change, holding that the consent remained valid despite flaws in the name-change process.

  • Company Name Change
  • Consent Judgment
  • Shareholder Resolution
  • Director Authority
  • Indoor Management Rule
  • Statutory Compliance
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2020] UGSC 63

Mukwano Enterprises Limited v Ranchhobhai Shivabhai and Another

Mukwano Enterprises Limited v Ranchhobhai Shivabhai and Another (Civil Application No. 16 of 2019) [2020] UGSC 63 (23 December 2020)

The Supreme Court held that the application for review was in substance a disguised appeal, seeking to overturn findings of fact and law already adjudicated at all levels of court. The grounds raised by the applicant did not disclose any error apparent on the face of the record, nor did they fall within the narrow scope for review under Rule 2(2) of the Supreme Court Rules. The Court reaffirmed that its intention in the original judgment was to nullify the illegal sale and restore all property, including land, buildings, and machinery, to African Textile Mills Ltd (in liquidation). The applic…

  • Company Liquidation
  • Bonafide Purchaser
  • Indoor Management Rule
  • Arrangement With Creditors
  • Valuation Of Property
  • Review Of Judgment
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [2016] UGCommC 204

Monitor Publications Ltd v Kampala Capital City Authority

Monitor Publications Ltd v Kampala Capital City Authority (Civil Suit No. 460 of 2015) [2016] UGCommC 204 (9 December 2016)

The court found that although the defendant, a public body, did not follow the prescribed procurement procedures under the PPDA Act, it nevertheless benefited from the advertising services provided by the plaintiff at the request and with the endorsement of its officers. The court held that the indoor management rule applies to the defendant as a body corporate, and that the plaintiff was entitled to rely on the apparent authority of the defendant's officers who instructed and approved the publication. The court further held that it would be unjust to allow the defendant to retain the benefit…

  • Quantum Meruit
  • Public Procurement
  • Apparent Authority
  • Indoor Management Rule
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.