Nile Bank Ltd and Anor v Thomas Kato and Ors - (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 1190 of 1999)
Nile Bank Ltd and Anor v Thomas Kato and Ors - (High Court Miscellaneous Application No. 1190 of 1999) [2000] UGCommC 5 (29 August 2000)
The court found that the written statement of defence filed by the defendants was a general denial and failed to specifically address the factual allegations in the plaint, thereby offending Order 6 rule 7 of the Civil Procedure Rules. The purported defence of illegality was not properly pleaded, as it did not specify the facts or statutory provisions allegedly breached, contrary to Order 6 rule 5. The alternative defences raised were either legally meaningless or contradicted by documentary evidence attached to the plaint. The court emphasized that pleadings must clearly set out the issues f…
Source excerpt
- Contract Breach
- Indemnity Clauses
- Pleadings Requirements
- Illegality Of Contracts