Nathoo v Rex
Nathoo v Rex (Criminal Appeal No. 6S of 1941) [1940] EACA 55 (1 January 1940)
The appeal was allowed because the conviction rested on accomplice evidence without corroboration, and the magistrate failed to address that legal requirement.
- Evidence Of Accomplices
- Corroboration Requirement
- Illegal Purchase Of Wildlife Products
- Accomplice-evidence
- Corroboration
- Criminal-appeal