Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
2 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Commercial And Corporate [2007] UGCA 74

Dr. Chebrot and Another v Central Purchasing Company Limited

Dr. Chebrot and Another v Central Purchasing Company Limited (Civil Appeal 77 of 2003) [2007] UGCA 74 (19 June 2007)

The Court of Appeal held that a continuing guarantee was enforceable despite the limitation argument, upheld liability for the reduced balance, and dismissed the appeal.

  • Guarantee Liability
  • Statute Of Limitations
  • Hire Purchase Agreements
  • Joint And Several Liability
  • Continuing-guarantee
  • Limitation-of-actions
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1953] EACA 25

Shortt v Searle

Shortt v Searle (Civil Suit No. 107 of 1952) [1953] EACA 25 (1 January 1953)

By signing the transfer of ownership and authorizing the registration of the car in the hirer's name, the plaintiff held out to third parties that the hirer was the true owner. This representation enabled the hirer to sell the car to Rehman Bros., who in turn sold it to the defendant. The defendant, having relied on the registration and licence documents and having acted in good faith, acquired the car without knowledge of the hire-purchase arrangement. The court held that the plaintiff is estopped from asserting his title against the defendant, as his actions facilitated the hirer's apparent…

  • Hire Purchase Agreements
  • Transfer Of Ownership
  • Estoppel
  • Sale Of Goods
  • Good Faith Purchaser
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [1940] EACA 3

Roadway Motors Limited v Ahluwalia

Roadway Motors Limited v Ahluwalia (Civil Appeal No. 4 of 1940) [1940] EACA 3 (1 January 1940)

The Court of Appeal set aside a costs order on an amendment application, holding that only costs thrown away by the amendment should be paid.

  • Amendment Of Pleadings
  • Costs Orders
  • Hire Purchase Agreements
  • Indemnity Clauses
  • Trusts In Commercial Context
  • Amendment-of-pleadings
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1936] EACA 55

Singh v Ghai and Sons (C.A. 13/1936.)

Singh v Ghai and Sons (C.A. 13/1936.) [1936] EACA 55 (1 January 1936)

The Court of Appeal held that the learned Chief Justice did not draw a wrong inference from the facts. The respondents had an independent title to the truck, having purchased it from a third party, and the hire-purchase agreement was genuine and not a disguised loan. The evidence did not support the appellant's contention that the transaction was a sham or that the agreement was a bill of sale requiring registration. The Court distinguished the present facts from those in Maas v. Pepper and Johnson v. Rees, where the property originally belonged to the transferee and the transaction was found…

  • Hire Purchase Agreements
  • Bills Of Sale
  • Registration Requirements
  • Sham Transactions
  • Inference Of Fact
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1930] EACA 88

Motor Mart and Exchange Ltd v Singh (C,C. 315/1930.)

Motor Mart and Exchange Ltd v Singh (C,C. 315/1930.) [1930] EACA 88 (1 January 1930)

The court held that destruction of the hired car ended the hire-purchase agreement, leaving the owner entitled to damages for loss of property.

  • Hire Purchase Agreements
  • Contractual Liability
  • Damages For Loss Of Property
  • Hire-purchase-agreements
  • Contract-damages
  • Loss-of-subject-matter
Read case analysis
Date unavailable
Commercial And Corporate [2018] UGCA 115

Cooper Motors corporation (U) ltd Vs Genesis Transporters & 2 Ors

Cooper Motors corporation (U) ltd Vs Genesis Transporters & 2 Ors (Civil Appeal No. 41 of 2009) [2018] UGCA 115 (19 November 2018)

The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge erred in revisiting and adjudicating issues of jurisdiction and locus standi that had already been conclusively determined by another judge, without any appeal or review pending. The trial judge further erred by raising and deciding a preliminary objection on locus standi on his own motion, thereby denying the appellant a fair hearing and failing to evaluate all the evidence, including witness statements and admissions by the respondents. The Court held that the appellant, by virtue of the addenda and the conduct of the parties, had capacity to s…

  • Hire Purchase Agreements
  • Privity Of Contract
  • Locus Standi
  • Guarantees Liability
  • Jurisdiction
  • Natural Justice
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.