Lwanga v Lubwama & Another
Lwanga v Lubwama & Another (Miscellaneous Cause 47 of 2024) [2024] UGHCLD 194 (23 July 2024)
The court found that the caveat in question had already been removed by the office of the 2nd Respondent, and the land subdivided, rendering the application moot. The 1st Respondent failed to take any substantive legal action since lodging the caveat in 2019, contrary to the principle that caveats are temporary protections requiring timely pursuit of claims. The affidavit in reply was partially sustained as hearsay and not within the deponent's knowledge, but this did not affect the substantive outcome. As the caveat no longer existed, the court declined to issue orders that would serve no pr…
Source excerpt
- Caveat Removal
- Registered Proprietorship
- Affidavit Evidence
- Hearsay In Affidavits