Twinomugisha v Uganda Alluminium Limited
Twinomugisha v Uganda Alluminium Limited (Civil Appeal 19 of 2001) [2002] UGSC 44 (24 April 2002)
The Supreme Court found that the pleadings and evidence did not establish a cause of action for defamation, harassment, or violation of constitutional rights. The respondent's actions in reporting the matter to police and demanding payment for goods supplied were lawful and justified, given the appellant's admitted signatures on the dishonoured cheques and the absence of evidence of malice or falsehood. The framing of issues by the Court of Appeal was proper, focusing on whether the claim and counterclaim were proved. The appellant could not be held liable for the counterclaim based on the bl…
Source excerpt
- Defamation
- Harassment
- Abuse Of Process
- Pleadings And Issues
- Counterclaim Liability