Omirambe v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 599 of 2015) [2024] UGCA 76 (27 March 2024)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Appeal 599 of 2015
Judge
Buteera, DCJ, Obura, JA, Mulyagonja, JA
The Court of Appeal upheld a 10-year sentence for aggravated robbery, holding that the trial judge had considered remand time and that the sentence was not ambiguous.
The Supreme Court upheld a 25-year sentence for defilement, holding that the appellant was not entitled to remand-time deduction because he was already serving another sentence.
Uganda v Olet (Criminal Revision 20 of 89) [1990] UGHC 34 (7 March 1990)
Court
High Court of Uganda
Case number
Criminal Revision 20 of 89
Judges
GM OKELLO, J
The trial magistrate failed to follow the mandatory procedure after the accused's plea of guilty by not putting the narrated facts to the accused for admission or denial, rendering the conviction unsafe. The particulars of the charge were vague, especially in count 2, failing to adequately inform the accused of the alleged offence. The accused's previous conviction was not proved as required by law, yet it was used to justify consecutive sentences and to treat the accused as an habitual offender. These procedural irregularities are fundamental and cannot be cured; therefore, the convictions a…
Rex v Liduma and Another (Cr. Conf. Case No. 861/1934.) [1934] EACA 2 (1 January 1934)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Cr. Conf. Case No. 861/1934.
Judge
Gamble. Ag. J. (Kenya), Sheridan CJ
The court reduced a burglary sentence from five to three years after finding the magistrate’s “confirmed criminal” label was unsupported by the record.