Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] UGHC 470

Uganda v Muhwezi Timothy

Uganda v Muhwezi Timothy (Criminal Session Case 105 of 2025) [2025] UGHC 470 (17 June 2025)

The High Court sentenced Muhwezi Timothy to 15 years on each of two counts, with concurrent terms and credit for 3 years 6 months on remand.

  • Rape
  • Aggravated Robbery
  • Sentencing Guidelines
  • Remand Credit
  • Habitual Offender
  • Criminal-sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] UGCA 76

Omirambe v Uganda

Omirambe v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 599 of 2015) [2024] UGCA 76 (27 March 2024)

The Court of Appeal upheld a 10-year sentence for aggravated robbery, holding that the trial judge had considered remand time and that the sentence was not ambiguous.

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Remand Period Deduction
  • Concurrent Vs Cumulative Sentences
  • Habitual Offender
  • Aggravated Robbery
  • Criminal-sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2021] UGSC 13

Byamukama v Uganda

Byamukama v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 14 of 2017) [2021] UGSC 13 (13 August 2021)

The Supreme Court upheld a 25-year sentence for defilement, holding that the appellant was not entitled to remand-time deduction because he was already serving another sentence.

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Remand Period Deduction
  • Aggravated Defilement
  • Habitual Offender
  • Judicial Discretion In Sentencing
  • Criminal-sentencing
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1990] UGHC 34

Uganda v Olet

Uganda v Olet (Criminal Revision 20 of 89) [1990] UGHC 34 (7 March 1990)

The trial magistrate failed to follow the mandatory procedure after the accused's plea of guilty by not putting the narrated facts to the accused for admission or denial, rendering the conviction unsafe. The particulars of the charge were vague, especially in count 2, failing to adequately inform the accused of the alleged offence. The accused's previous conviction was not proved as required by law, yet it was used to justify consecutive sentences and to treat the accused as an habitual offender. These procedural irregularities are fundamental and cannot be cured; therefore, the convictions a…

  • Plea Of Guilty Procedure
  • Proof Of Previous Conviction
  • Sentencing Irregularities
  • Charge Particulars
  • Habitual Offender
  • Magistrate Duties
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1934] EACA 2

Rex v Liduma and Another (Cr. Conf. Case No. 861/1934.)

Rex v Liduma and Another (Cr. Conf. Case No. 861/1934.) [1934] EACA 2 (1 January 1934)

The court reduced a burglary sentence from five to three years after finding the magistrate’s “confirmed criminal” label was unsupported by the record.

  • Sentencing Principles
  • Burglary
  • Sentence Reduction
  • Habitual Offender
  • Youthful Offender
  • Sentencing-principles
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.