Uganda Air Cargo Corporation Ltd v Kirunda & 5 Ors (Misc. Application No. 385 of 2013)
Uganda Air Cargo Corporation Ltd v Kirunda & 5 Ors (Misc. Application No. 385 of 2013) [2014] UGHCCD 130 (29 September 2014)
The court found that the Attorney General was properly instructed and had apparent authority to represent the applicant and compromise the suit. The evidence showed that the applicant actively participated in the proceedings, provided all necessary documents, and admitted liability. The consent judgment was entered after due consultation and with the approval of the Solicitor General. There was no proof of fraud, collusion, mistake, or absence of material facts. The application to set aside the consent judgment was based on afterthoughts and financial constraints, which do not constitute vali…
Source excerpt
- Setting Aside Consent Judgment
- Authority Of Counsel
- Grounds For Varying Judgments
- Collusion And Fraud
- Binding Effect Of Consents