Uganda v Bagarukayo (HCT-00-AC-CN 9 of 2013)
Uganda v Bagarukayo (HCT-00-AC-CN 9 of 2013) [2013] UGHCACD 8 (12 June 2013)
The appellate court found that the trial magistrate failed to properly evaluate the evidence, which included corroborated testimony and documentary proof that the respondent, a public official, received money as gratification in connection with the Koboko District teachers' salary scheme. The evidence established that the respondent influenced the payroll process, provided his bank account for deposits of excess funds, and that the money trail ended with him. The court held that the prosecution had proved all ingredients of the offence of corruption under section 2(e) of the Anti-Corruption A…
Source excerpt
- Corruption Offences
- Public Official Misconduct
- Gratification And Undue Advantage
- Evidence Of Accomplices