Rex v Said (Cr. App. No. 134 of 1938)
Rex v Said (Cr. App. No. 134 of 1938) [1938] EACA 196 (1 January 1938)
The court allowed the appeal because the charge under Penal Code section 167(4) did not allege that the accused was “found wandering,” an essential element of the offence.
- Rogue And Vagabond
- Penal Code Section 167
- Elements Of Offence
- Gambling
- Interpretation Of Statute
- Criminal-law