Walusimbi v Nakalanzi and 4 Others
Walusimbi v Nakalanzi and 4 Others (Miscellaneous Application 386 of 2018) [2019] UGCA 2090 (30 July 2019)
The Court of Appeal held that its inherent power under Rule 2(2) of the Rules of the Court extends only to setting aside judgments that have been proved null and void after they have been passed. In this case, the applicant failed to strictly prove fraud in the procurement of the judgment, as the alleged forgery of the sale agreement was not established by admissible evidence. The court distinguished the cited Supreme Court authority, noting that the fraud alleged was not directly related to the judgment itself but to material facts involving deceased persons, and that such fraud cannot be pr…
Source excerpt
- Setting Aside Judgment
- Fresh Evidence
- Res Judicata
- Fraud In Land Transactions