Ismail Bros v Bogha (Civ. App. No. 18/1935.)
Ismail Bros v Bogha (Civ. App. No. 18/1935.) [1936] EACA 15 (1 January 1936)
The agreement between the parties created a tenancy at will, not an equitable interest in the land for the respondent. Under such a tenancy, the vendors were entitled to terminate the agreement without notice upon default in payment of interest for three consecutive months, and no formal demand for payment was required. The respondent's caveat was therefore improperly lodged and should be removed. Regarding the costs awarded in the previous appeal, the lien claimed by the respondent's advocates could only be enforced by the advocates themselves and did not extend beyond the rights of the clie…
Source excerpt
- Sale Of Land
- Tenancy At Will
- Forfeiture Of Contract
- Advocate Lien
- Caveat Removal