Nankuluzze & 2 Others v National Forestry Authority
Nankuluzze & 2 Others v National Forestry Authority (Miscellaneous Application 1918 of 2024) [2025] UGHCLD 10 (16 January 2025)
The application for review succeeds because the applicants presented new and important evidence—the Report of the Commissioner for Surveys and Mappings—which was not considered in the original suit and which the respondent admitted as binding in related proceedings. The court found that the suit land does not form part of Kajjansi Forest Reserve, as established by the Commissioner’s report and admissions by the respondent. Additionally, the court identified a manifest error: the subject matter had already been conclusively determined in HCCS 885 of 2017, and the subsequent judgment in HCCS 29…
Source excerpt
- Review Of Judgment
- Forest Reserve Boundaries
- Certificate Of Title Validity
- Admissions In Pleadings