Mukisa v Nabukalu
Mukisa v Nabukalu (Civil Suit No. 29 of 2016) [2019] UGHCFD 51 (20 December 2019)
The court found that the plaintiffs failed to prove fraud or mismanagement attributable to the defendant, as no documentary evidence or testimony from the co-administrator was adduced. However, upon ordering and reviewing the record of Administration Cause No.781 of 2006, the court found no inventory had been filed by the defendant or co-administrator, which constitutes just cause for revocation under Section 234 of the Succession Act. The plaintiffs did not prove entitlement to Letters of Administration, as there was no evidence of vetting or certificate of no objection from the Administrato…
Source excerpt
- Letters Of Administration
- Revocation Of Grant
- Failure To File Inventory
- Administration Of Estates
- Burden Of Proof
- Court Orders