Ali and Another v The Queen (Criminal Appeal No. 201 of 1956; Criminal Appeal No. 202 of 1956) [1956] EACA 20 (1 January 1956)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 201 of 1956 ; Criminal Appeal No. 202 of 1956
Judge
Forbes J, Rudd J
The court held that extra-judicial statements cannot be admitted before asking the accused whether they object to admissibility and, if disputed, trying voluntariness first.
Hamidi v Reginam (Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1956) [1950] EACA 487 (1 January 1950)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1956
Judge
Bacon, JA, Edmonds J, Sinclair, VP
The East African Court of Appeal held that a confession made to a district commissioner was inadmissible because he had not clearly separated his magistrial role from police functions.
Karuditu v Reginam (Criminal Appeal No. 551 of 1955) [1950] EACA 480 (1 January 1950)
Court
East African Court of Appeal
Case number
Criminal Appeal No. 551 of 1955
Judge
Bacon, JA, Briggs, JA, Worley, P
The Court held that although the correct procedure was not followed—specifically, the failure to allow second cross-examination of the police officer in the presence of assessors after the statement was ruled admissible—this omission did not result in a miscarriage of justice. The principle established in R. v. Murray applies equally to trials with assessors, entitling the accused to present the full case regarding extra-judicial statements to both judge and assessors. However, in this case, the evidence against the appellant was overwhelming even without the disputed statement, and the proce…