Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Land And Property [1998] UGHCLD 2

R. M. Patel and Others v Attorney General and Others

R. M. Patel and Others v Attorney General and Others (Civil Suit 54 of 1995) [1998] UGHCLD 2 (4 August 1998)

The court held that the Departed Asians Property Custodian Board (DAPCB) had no legal authority under the Expropriated Properties Act to receive or reject applications for repossession of expropriated property, as such powers are vested exclusively in the Minister. All transactions involving the suit property prior to the coming into force of the Act were nullified, and the property reverted to Government. The plaintiffs' suit, brought as an original action against the DAPCB and other defendants, was misconceived and incompetent, as any challenge to the Minister's issuance of a certificate of…

  • Expropriated Property Act
  • Repossession Certificate
  • Ministerial Discretion
  • Nullification Of Transactions
  • Cause Of Action
  • Statutory Appeal
Read case analysis
Land And Property [1998] UGHC 9

Registered Trustees of Kampala Insitute v Attorney General

Registered Trustees of Kampala Insitute v Attorney General (Civil Appeal No. 51 of 1996) (Civil Appeal No. 51 of 1996) [1998] UGHC 9 (27 July 1998)

The High Court allowed an appeal over refusal of a repossession certificate and ordered the Minister to issue it, holding the re-entry of the property was null and void.

  • Expropriated Property Act
  • Repossession Certificate
  • Ministerial Discretion
  • Government Trusteeship
  • Nullification Of Dealings
  • Expropriated-property-act
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [1994] UGSC 50

Yahaya Kiriisa v Attorney General and Another

Yahaya Kiriisa v Attorney General and Another (Civil Appeal 7 of 1994) [1994] UGSC 50 (21 November 1994)

The Supreme Court set aside a High Court dismissal for want of prosecution, holding the adjournment refusal was not a judicious exercise of discretion.

  • Adjournment Discretion
  • Right To Counsel
  • Repossession Of Property
  • Expropriated Property Act
  • Want Of Prosecution
  • Aggrieved Party Status
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.