Isingoma v Law Development Centre
Isingoma v Law Development Centre (Miscellaneous Cause 344 of 2020) [2024] UGHCCD 123 (12 July 2024)
The court held that while the respondent's affidavit in reply was filed late and without prior permission, the applicant suffered no prejudice as he was able to respond, and substantive justice in human rights matters requires a liberal approach to technicalities. The plea of res judicata was rejected because the previous case between the parties was dismissed on technical grounds and not on its merits. The principle of estoppel was found inapplicable, as exhaustion of internal remedies and repeated failure of examinations do not bar a litigant from seeking enforcement of constitutional right…
Source excerpt
- Right To Fair Hearing
- Equality And Non Discrimination
- Judicial Review Of Administrative Action
- Estoppel
- Res Judicata