Finish Refgee Council v Kasangaki (Civil Revision 1 of 2025) [2025] UGHC 97 (3 February 2025)
Court
High Court of Uganda
Case number
Civil Revision 1 of 2025
Judge
Byaruhanga Rugyema, J
The High Court held that revision was not available because the magistrate had jurisdiction to decide the preliminary objection. The application was dismissed with costs.
Lubuulwa Tonny v Standard Chartered Bank (Civil Appeal 108 of 2012) [2015] UGCA 2039 (20 February 2015)
Court
Court of Appeal of Uganda
Case number
Civil Appeal 108 of 2012
Judge
Nshimye, JA, Kakuru, JA, Tibatemwa, JA/ JCC
The Court of Appeal found that the document annexed as 'A' to the written statement of defence was properly admitted in evidence by consent of both parties at the scheduling conference and confirmed by the joint scheduling memorandum. The appellant was cross-examined and re-examined on this document, and its evidential value was determined after witness testimony. The court held that only new loans and 'top ups' disbursed in 2007 qualified as 'booked' for the purposes of the grand prize, not the total outstanding loan amounts, and the appellant did not meet the required threshold. The court f…