Kampala Capital City Authority v Nabimara & 10 Others
Kampala Capital City Authority v Nabimara & 10 Others (MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS NO.321,322,323,324,325,326,327,328, 329,331 & 332 OF 2019) [2020] UGHCCD 84 (8 May 2020)
The court found that the applicant was bound by the actions and representations of its officials, who had authority to negotiate and execute the consent judgments. There was no credible evidence of fraud, misrepresentation, or mistake sufficient to warrant review or setting aside of the consent judgments. The applicant's claims of lack of management approval and discovery of new evidence were unsubstantiated and amounted to an afterthought. The court held that the applicant was estopped from denying the authority of its officials and that the application for review constituted an abuse of cou…
Source excerpt
- Review Of Judgments
- Consent Judgments
- Employment Appointments
- Salary Arrears
- Abuse Of Court Process