Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page: 2 court collections
Last checked: 18 Sep 2026, 02:47 UTC

Results update automatically as you type.

Judge

Topic

Legal area

Court

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters

30 Sept 2021

Election Petitions [2021] UGHCEP 14

Watenga v Mudoi and Another

Watenga v Mudoi and Another (Election Petition No. 16 of 2021) [2021] UGHCEP 14 (30 September 2021)

Court: Election Petitions of Uganda
Case number: Election Petition No. 16 of 2021
Judge: Bashaija, J

The court found that the Petitioner failed to provide sufficient and credible evidence to support his allegations that the 1st Respondent lacked the requisite academic qualifications or used documents belonging to another person. The evidence adduced did not cast doubt on the authenticity of the academic documents, and the use of names interchangeably was not sufficient to invalidate the nomination or election. Allegations of ballot stuffing, multiple voting, and failure to use biometric data machines were unsupported by direct evidence, with key witnesses either not providing affidavits or p…

Source excerpt

Parliamentary Elections
Nomination Qualifications
Electoral Offences
Burden Of Proof
Bribery
Election Procedure

Read case analysis

30 Jun 2010

Civil Procedure [2010] UGHC 235

Adyera Robert and Others v Opwonya Noah and Others

Adyera Robert and Others v Opwonya Noah and Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 060 of 2010) [2010] UGHC 235 (30 June 2010)

Court: High Court of Uganda
Case number: Miscellaneous Application No. 060 of 2010
Judge: Kasule, JA

The court found that the Acholi War Debt Claimants Association, having become a company limited by guarantee, is a private entity and not subject to prerogative orders of judicial review. The meeting of 5th June 2010, which purported to remove the applicants and elect the respondents, was procedurally flawed, as the chairperson and secretary were not properly elected and non-members participated in decision-making. The applicants' continued stay in office was also unlawful, as their terms had expired. To resolve the leadership dispute and ensure proper governance, the court exercised its powe…