Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [1938] EACA 120

Rex v Kasanga (Cr. App. No. 77 of 1938.)

Rex v Kasanga (Cr. App. No. 77 of 1938.) [1938] EACA 120 (1 January 1938)

The court held that a dying declaration is admissible only where the declarant’s own death is in question, allowing the appeal.

  • Hearsay Evidence
  • Dying Declarations
  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Murder
  • Indian Evidence Act Section 32
  • Hearsay-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1937] EACA 107

Rex v Mirandu (Cr.A. 23/1934.)

Rex v Mirandu (Cr.A. 23/1934.) [1937] EACA 107 (1 January 1937)

The Court of Appeal found that the trial judge attached excessive value to the dying declaration of the deceased without sufficient corroboration. The circumstances under which the statement was made—at night, following a violent assault, and without the deceased providing reasons for his identification—rendered it unreliable. The corroborative evidence from the boy Mizambwa was inconsistent and possibly influenced by prior knowledge of the accused's clothing. The evidence regarding the accused's alibi was not sufficiently rebutted to exclude reasonable doubt. The combination of these factors…

  • Dying Declarations
  • Murder Conviction
  • Evidence Corroboration
  • Alibi
  • Credibility Of Witnesses
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1936] EACA 36

Rex v Gabriel (Cr. App. No. 111/1935.)

Rex v Gabriel (Cr. App. No. 111/1935.) [1936] EACA 36 (1 January 1936)

The court held that a deceased’s statement was not admissible as a dying declaration because there was no proof of belief in impending death. The conviction was quashed.

  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Dying Declarations
  • Misreception Of Evidence
  • Murder Trial
  • Cross Examination
  • Burden Of Proof
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1929] EACA 134

Robin v Rex (Cr.. App. 3/1929.)

Robin v Rex (Cr.. App. 3/1929.) [1929] EACA 134 (1 January 1929)

The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa quashed a murder conviction, holding that a wife in a native polygamous marriage could testify against her husband, and excluding a disputed post-stabbing statement.

  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Spousal Testimony
  • Native Customary Marriage
  • Murder
  • Dying Declarations
  • Spousal-testimony
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.