Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
4 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [2025] UGHC 217

Uganda v Kiprop and Others

Uganda v Kiprop and Others (Criminal Session Case 187 of 2023) [2025] UGHC 217 (16 January 2025)

The High Court convicted Kiprop Jacob and Mafabi Silver of aggravated robbery, but acquitted Wadada Titus after finding no proof he joined the robbery.

  • Aggravated Robbery
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Dna Evidence
  • Common Intention
  • Alibi Defence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2024] UGHC 509

Uganda v Kalyegira & Another

Uganda v Kalyegira & Another (Criminal Session 282 of 2022) [2024] UGHC 509 (18 June 2024)

The High Court of Uganda at Fort Portal acquitted two accused persons of murder after finding that circumstantial and DNA evidence left reasonable doubt.

  • Murder
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Last Seen Doctrine
  • Malice Aforethought
  • Dna Evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2023] UGHCCRD 174

Uganda v Katumba and 2 Others (HCT-00-CR-SC 619 of 2020)

Uganda v Katumba and 2 Others (HCT-00-CR-SC 619 of 2020) [2023] UGHCCRD 174 (15 September 2023)

The High Court in Kampala acquitted three accused persons of aggravated robbery, and one accused also of rape, after finding the identification evidence unreliable.

  • Aggravated Robbery
  • Rape
  • Identification Evidence
  • Burden Of Proof
  • Dna Evidence
  • Witness Credibility
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [2022] UGCA 247

Musana v Uganda

Musana v Uganda (Criminal Appeal No. 705 of 2015) [2022] UGCA 247 (7 October 2022)

The Court of Appeal found that the circumstantial evidence, particularly the DNA analysis, placed the appellant at the scene of the crime and excluded the other suspect, Kateeba. The doctrine of 'last seen' and the appellant's conduct, including his proximity to the deceased and the forensic evidence, were incompatible with innocence and supported the conviction for murder. The trial judge's reliance on circumstantial evidence was proper and consistent with established legal principles. However, the sentence of 25 years was set aside because the trial judge failed to consider the time spent o…

  • Murder
  • Circumstantial Evidence
  • Dna Evidence
  • Sentencing Principles
  • Rape
  • Last Seen Doctrine
Read case analysis
Family And Children [2019] UGHCCD 206

Ndyabahika Vs Adyeri

Ndyabahika Vs Adyeri (MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.69 OF 2019) [2019] UGHCCD 206 (9 July 2019)

The High Court at Mukono dismissed an application for leave to appeal against an interlocutory order directing DNA testing to resolve a paternity dispute.

  • Paternity Dispute
  • Dna Evidence
  • Leave To Appeal
  • Interlocutory Orders
  • Paternity-dispute
  • Dna-evidence
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.