Uganda Case Law

Busingye v Mukisa (HCT-05-CV-CA 2 of 2019)

Busingye v Mukisa (HCT-05-CV-CA 2 of 2019) [2023] UGHC 58 (31 August 2023)

Court

High Court of Uganda

Case number

HCT-05-CV-CA 2 of 2019

Judge

Joyce Kavuma, J

The High Court found that the trial Magistrate erred by failing to properly evaluate the evidence regarding the acquisition and ownership of the properties in question. The evidence established that the land at Karukwerezi was jointly acquired by the parties during the marriage, with the Appellant contributing to its purchase, making it matrimonial property subject to division. The land at Rutooma, however, was inherited by the Respondent and had other equitable interests, and thus was not matrimonial property. The trial Magistrate's reliance on submissions and assumptions rather than evidenc…

Source excerpt

• Matrimonial Property
• Division Of Property On Divorce
• Contribution To Property Acquisition
• Inheritance Vs Joint Property

Busingye v Mukisa (High Court Civil Appeal 2 of 2019)

Busingye v Mukisa (High Court Civil Appeal 2 of 2019) [2023] UGHCFD 37 (31 August 2023)

Court

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

Case number

High Court Civil Appeal 2 of 2019

Judge

Joyce Kavuma, J

The High Court allowed a matrimonial property appeal, holding that only the Karukwerezi land was matrimonial property and should be shared equally.

• Matrimonial Property
• Division Of Property On Divorce
• Contribution To Acquisition
• Inheritance Vs Joint Property
• Matrimonial-property
• Division-of-property-on-divorce

Namagembe v Kawala (Divorce Cause No. 1 of 2017)

Namagembe v Kawala (Divorce Cause No. 1 of 2017) [2023] UGHCFD 6 (7 February 2023)

Court

HC: Family Division (Uganda)

Case number

Divorce Cause No. 1 of 2017

Judges

Zeija, PJ

The court found that the Petitioner failed to provide credible evidence of any monetary or non-monetary contribution to the acquisition or development of the disputed property, which was solely purchased and registered in the Respondent's name before the marriage. The Petitioner lacked definitive knowledge of the property's description and location, and her claims were speculative and unsupported by documentary evidence. The court held that property acquired individually before marriage does not automatically become jointly owned upon marriage, and the right to own property individually is pr…

Source excerpt

• Matrimonial Property
• Division Of Property On Divorce
• Ownership Of Property Acquired Before Marriage
• Burden Of Proof In Divorce
• Contribution To Property Acquisition

Ambayo v Aserua

Ambayo v Aserua (Civil Appeal No. 100 of 2015) [2022] UGCA 272 (15 November 2022)

Court

Court of Appeal of Uganda

Case number

Civil Appeal No. 100 of 2015

Judge

Kibeedi Mutangula, JA, Gashirabake, JA, Musoke, JA

The Court of Appeal held that property acquired before formal marriage but used as the family home, and to which both parties contributed, can be treated as matrimonial property. However, the respondent's contributions, though both monetary and non-monetary, did not justify an equal (50%) share as previously awarded by the High Court. The appellate court found that the trial judge failed to properly evaluate the evidence, particularly regarding the respondent's capacity and actual involvement in construction and acquisition, and did not account for the appellant's substantial investment in th…

Source excerpt

• Matrimonial Property
• Division Of Property On Divorce
• Spousal Contribution
• Non Monetary Contribution
• Valuation Of Property
• Appellate Review