Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Intellectual Property [2024] UGRSB 5

Krystalline Salt Limited v S.D.T Group of Companies (Trademark Application 40233 of 2009)

Krystalline Salt Limited v S.D.T Group of Companies (Trademark Application 40233 of 2009) [2024] UGRSB 5 (2 May 2024)

The applicant's "JJABARI" trademark is visually, phonetically, and conceptually similar to the opponent's registered "HABARI" trademark. Both marks feature nearly identical design elements, including coconut trees and birds, and the words are placed similarly. The goods covered by both marks are identical. The minor differences in lettering and small design elements do not sufficiently distinguish the marks. Applying the statutory prohibition under section 25 of the Trademarks Act, 2010, and established judicial tests for likelihood of confusion, the Registrar finds that the applicant's mark…

  • Trademark Similarity
  • Likelihood Of Confusion
  • Visual And Phonetic Comparison
  • Distinctiveness Of Marks
  • Fair Competition
  • Registration Prohibition
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [2023] UGCommC 98

United Breweries Limited v Rest Club One Limited

United Breweries Limited v Rest Club One Limited (Civil Suit 477 of 2020) [2023] UGCommC 98 (24 February 2023)

The High Court dismissed a trademark infringement and passing off suit over CLUB 5 and CLUB One Premium Gin, finding no likelihood of confusion and no proven damage.

  • Trademark Infringement
  • Passing Off
  • Likelihood Of Confusion
  • Distinctiveness Of Marks
  • Trademark-infringement
  • Passing-off
Read case analysis
Intellectual Property [1929] EACA 60

In Re: of an Appliaction for Registration of a Trade Mark, No 24 of 1929 by the Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. of Ohio, U.S.A.; In Re: of the Registration of Trade Marks Ordinance Chapter 89 Revised Edition of he Laws of Kenya, Section 7, Subsection 5. (C.C. 184/1929 (Msa))

In Re: of an Appliaction for Registration of a Trade Mark, No 24 of 1929 by the Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. of Ohio, U.S.A.; In Re: of the Registration of Trade Marks Ordinance Chapter 89 Revised Edition of he Laws of Kenya, Section 7, Subsection 5. (C.C. 184/1929 (Msa)) [1929] EACA 60 (1 January 1929)

The court held that limited but growing use of “Gum-Dipped” in Kenya could support distinctiveness for trade mark registration in a young colony.

  • Trade Mark Registration
  • Distinctiveness Of Marks
  • User Requirement
  • Trade Mark Law Kenya
  • Trade-mark-registration
  • Trade-mark-distinctiveness
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.