Jaspar Phaguda v Kwizera
Jaspar Phaguda v Kwizera (Civil Suit No. 392 of 2014) [2021] UGHCCD 72 (7 July 2021)
The court found that a valid contract existed between the plaintiff and defendant, evidenced by the signed agreement and the issuance of cheques for the outstanding balance. The defendant's argument that the agreement was not enforceable was rejected, as he had relied on it for his own counterclaim. The defendant's issuance of dishonoured cheques constituted breach of contract, and the plaintiff was entitled to recover the sum of USD 124,143. The defendant failed to prove his counterclaim for unjust enrichment, as no evidence was adduced to show payment in excess of what was owed. The court a…
Source excerpt
- Breach Of Contract
- Dishonoured Cheques
- Unjust Enrichment
- Money Had And Received
- Contractual Remedies