Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page: 2 court collections
Last checked: 18 Sep 2026, 04:49 UTC

Results update automatically as you type.

Judge

Topic

Legal area

Court

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters

7 Mar 2025

Employment And Labour [2025] UGIC 17

Wanyoto Cabot Desderious v Uganda Civil Aviation Authority (Labour Dispute Appeal 17 of 2021)

Wanyoto Cabot Desderious v Uganda Civil Aviation Authority (Labour Dispute Appeal 17 of 2021) [2025] UGIC 17 (7 March 2025)

Court: Industrial Court of Uganda
Case number: Labour Dispute Appeal 17 of 2021
Judges: Wabwire Musana, J, Musimbi, Panel Member, Bigirimana penal member, Lapenga

The court found that the restructuring exercise, including the compression of salary grades and placement of the appellant in grade 10, was lawful, organization-wide, and did not target the appellant individually. The evidence showed that the appellant's salary was enhanced, not diminished, and that all staff were affected equally by the restructuring. The appellant failed to demonstrate discrimination based on any protected attribute under Article 21 of the Constitution or Section 5 of the Employment Act. The Labour Officer properly evaluated the evidence and law, and there was no basis for…

Source excerpt

Workplace Restructuring
Salary Grading
Discrimination In Employment
Terminal Benefits Computation
Retrospective Salary Enhancement

Read case analysis

23 Mar 2023

Administrative Law [2023] UGHCCD 198

Rusoke v FortPortal City Council and Another (Misc Cause 11 of 2022)

Rusoke v FortPortal City Council and Another (Misc Cause 11 of 2022) [2023] UGHCCD 198 (23 March 2023)

Court: HC: Civil Division (Uganda)
Case number: Misc Cause 11 of 2022
Judge: Mugabo, J

The court found that the process leading to the applicant's retirement was marred by illegality, procedural impropriety, and unreasonableness. The City Service Commission lacked jurisdiction to retire the applicant, as such power for the position of Deputy Town Clerk is vested in the Public Service Commission. The required procedure, including clearance by the Permanent Secretary, was not followed. The applicant was subjected to discrimination, as other staff without the required master's degree were retained and given grace periods, while he was not. The decision to retire the applicant was…