Necta (U) Limited and Another v Crane Bank Limited
Necta (U) Limited and Another v Crane Bank Limited (Civil Appeal No. 219 of 2013) [2021] UGCA 34 (8 June 2021)
The Court of Appeal found that the special resolution authorizing the mortgage was invalid, as it was not signed by all directors as required by the company's articles and Regulation 106 of Table A. The mortgage and further charges were defective for lack of proper execution, absence of the company seal, and signatures not in Latin character, contrary to the Registration of Titles Act and company law. The sale of the property was therefore unlawful, as it was based on invalid security instruments and notice requirements were not met. The respondent bank failed to discharge its duty to ensure…
Source excerpt
- Company Resolutions
- Mortgage Execution
- Directors Authority
- Invalid Security Interest
- Notice Requirements
- Damages For Conversion