Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
1 court collection
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Criminal Law [1947] EACA 42

Rex v Titi

Rex v Titi (Criminal Appeal No. 153 of 1947) [1947] EACA 42 (1 January 1947)

The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa held that a judge admitting a deposition under section 275 of the Tanganyika Criminal Procedure Code must state the grounds for doing so.

  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Depositions
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Judicial Discretion
  • Criminal-procedure
  • Admissibility-of-evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1941] EACA 61

Rex v Ndwiga

Rex v Ndwiga (Criminal Appeal No. 80 of 1941) [1941] EACA 61 (1 January 1941)

The court held that the deposition of the witness Njaggi at the preliminary inquiry could not be used as substantive evidence at trial, but only to test credibility. The improper admission of such evidence did not warrant reversal of the conviction because, even excluding it, there was ample admissible evidence to support the finding that the appellant intentionally stabbed the deceased with a heavy, sharp weapon, causing a severe wound. The evidence established malice aforethought, making the killing prima facie murder. The appellant's claim of accident was rejected based on the credible tes…

  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Depositions
  • Malice Aforethought
  • Murder
  • Credibility Of Witnesses
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1938] EACA 139

Rex v Shipemba (Cr. App. No. 125/1938)

Rex v Shipemba (Cr. App. No. 125/1938) [1938] EACA 139 (1 January 1938)

The Court of Appeal dismissed a criminal appeal, holding that sufficient evidence remained despite discrepancies between depositions and trial testimony and excluding an inadmissible confession.

  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Depositions
  • Confessions
  • Attendance Of Witnesses
  • Criminal-law
  • Evidence
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1938] EACA 52

Ruadiba v Rex (Cr. App. No. 44/1938)

Ruadiba v Rex (Cr. App. No. 44/1938) [1938] EACA 52 (1 January 1938)

The East African Court of Appeal held that a prosecution witness’s prior deposition could not be used to discredit her without following section 155 of the Indian Evidence Act.

  • Hostile Witness
  • Use Of Depositions
  • Self Defence
  • Provocation
  • Murder Vs Manslaughter
  • Hostile-witness
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1937] EACA 180

Mbola v Rex (Cr.A. 113/1934.)

Mbola v Rex (Cr.A. 113/1934.) [1937] EACA 180 (1 January 1937)

The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa held that an equivocal statement could not be treated as a guilty plea and that depositions should not be used in sentencing.

  • Manslaughter
  • Plea Of Guilty
  • Sentencing Procedure
  • Use Of Depositions
  • Criminal Negligence
  • Criminal-appeal
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1936] EACA 31

Rex v Ziyaya (Cr. App. No. 134/1935.)

Rex v Ziyaya (Cr. App. No. 134/1935.) [1936] EACA 31 (1 January 1936)

The Court of Appeal for Eastern Africa quashed a murder conviction after finding the key witness’s trial evidence materially contradicted her deposition and was unsafe to rely on.

  • Evidence Discrepancies
  • Witness Credibility
  • Depositions
  • Murder
  • Appeal Procedure
  • Criminal-procedure
Read case analysis
Criminal Law [1936] EACA 50

Rex v Nsiyaleta (Cr. App. No. 32/1936.)

Rex v Nsiyaleta (Cr. App. No. 32/1936.) [1936] EACA 50 (1 January 1936)

The court upheld a murder conviction and held that a deceased witness’s deposition cannot be admitted without formal proof of death under section 266(a), even if defence counsel does not object.

  • Admissibility Of Evidence
  • Depositions
  • Proof Of Death
  • Criminal Appeal Procedure
  • Criminal-appeal
  • Evidence-admissibility
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.