Rex v Amina and Another
Rex v Amina and Another (Criminal Appeals Nos. 259 and 260 of 1948 Consolidated) [1949] EACA 29 (1 January 1949)
The Court held that a person cannot be convicted as aider and abettor unless the principal offence was committed. It quashed some convictions and upheld others.
- Aiding And Abetting
- Rent Restriction Offences
- Premium Demand For Tenancy
- Excess Rent Acceptance
- Definition Of Landlord
- Accomplice Evidence