Uganda v Francis Dego
Uganda v Francis Dego (Criminal Revision Order No. 52/91) [1991] UGHC 77 (25 March 1991)
The High Court held that a 20-month sentence did not require confirmation, set aside an illegal default sentence, and noted that other evidence still supported the conviction.
- Shop Breaking
- Theft
- Sentencing Confirmation
- Default Sentence Legality
- Child Witness Evidence
- Criminal-revision