Ochom v Attorney General (UHRC/SRT/04/2008)
Ochom v Attorney General (UHRC/SRT/04/2008) [2018] UGHRC 26 (22 May 2018)
The Tribunal found that the applicant's right to freedom from torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment was violated by police officers acting in their official capacity. The applicant's testimony, corroborated by eyewitness and medical evidence, established that he was assaulted, suffered soft tissue injuries, and was humiliated in front of his family. The respondent's arguments regarding the sufficiency of medical evidence and the intent behind the assault were rejected, as the law does not require medical evidence in every case of assault and the definition of torture…
Source excerpt
- Freedom From Torture
- Vicarious Liability
- Damages For Human Rights Violations
- Police Misconduct