Uganda
Sign in
Uganda Source-linked decisions Coverage checked

Uganda Case Law

Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.

Courts on this page
3 court collections
Last checked

Uganda decisions

Decisions matching the current search

Clear filters
Civil Procedure [2023] UGHCCD 358

Mboya and Another v Uganda Revenue Authority

Mboya and Another v Uganda Revenue Authority (Civil Suit 472 of 2017) [2023] UGHCCD 358 (21 November 2023)

The High Court determined that it does not have original jurisdiction to hear tax or customs disputes as a court of first instance. The proper procedure requires an aggrieved party to first seek review from the Commissioner of Uganda Revenue Authority under the East African Customs Management Act, 2004. If dissatisfied, the party must then appeal to the Tax Appeals Tribunal as mandated by the Tax Appeals Tribunal Act. Only after exhausting these avenues may the matter be brought before the High Court on appeal. The Plaintiffs failed to follow this statutory procedure after the dismissal of th…

  • Jurisdiction Of High Court
  • Tax Dispute Resolution
  • Tax Appeals Tribunal Procedure
  • Customs Forfeiture
  • Procedural Requirements
Read case analysis
Civil Procedure [2016] UGCommC 40

Masaka Construction Co. Ltd v Uganda Revenue Authority

Masaka Construction Co. Ltd v Uganda Revenue Authority (Miscellaneous Application No. 94 of 2016) [2016] UGCommC 40 (6 May 2016)

The court found that the applicant failed to establish a prima facie case with a probability of success for the grant of a temporary injunction. The goods in question were restricted and had been imported in contravention of statutory requirements under the East African Community Customs Management Act and the Control of Agricultural Chemicals Act. The respondent, Uganda Revenue Authority, acted within its statutory powers to seize and forfeit the goods. The applicant, having purchased the goods while they were still under customs control and subject to forfeiture, could not acquire better ri…

  • Temporary Injunctions
  • Customs Forfeiture
  • Restricted Goods
  • Locus Standi
  • Ownership Of Imported Goods
Read case analysis
Commercial And Corporate [1953] EACA 9

Ramji v Regional Commissioner of Customs and Excise

Ramji v Regional Commissioner of Customs and Excise (Civil Suit No. 70 of 1953) [1953] EACA 9 (1 January 1953)

The court held that a Kenya import licence was required for a car brought from Uganda and originally from the Belgian Congo, and upheld forfeiture under customs law.

  • Customs Forfeiture
  • Import Licensing
  • Estoppel
  • Interpretation Of Statutes
  • Customs-forfeiture
  • Import-licensing
Read case analysis

About this JurisAssist collection

Uganda decisions are organised by court, judge, legal area and indexed issue so a practitioner can move from a proposition to a citable authority with the surrounding context intact.