Search judgments by proposition, citation, court, judge or legal topic, then move directly into the source-grounded case analysis.
Results update automatically as you type.
Uganda decisions
Decisions matching the current search
Wananchi Group Uganda Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (Tax Application 273 of 2022) [2025] UGTAT 9 (20 April 2025)
The Tribunal held that the imported cardless CAMs were decryption devices, not television reception apparatus, and upheld classification under HS 8529.90.00.
Shurik Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (Tax Application 184 of 2023) [2025] UGTAT 2 (28 February 2025)
The Tribunal upheld URA’s reclassification of cough drops and a skin cream, finding the products were not medicaments for customs purposes.
Mahoma Uganda Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (Application 123 of 2019) [2023] UGTAT 39 (22 December 2023)
The Tribunal upheld Uganda Revenue Authority’s reclassification of hydropower imports, holding the disputed valves, controls and cables fell under specific tariff headings.
Regal Paints Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (Application 10 of 2021) [2023] UGTAT 52 (31 August 2023)
The Tribunal partly allowed a customs tax challenge by Regal Paints, setting aside most assessments on pigments, Sadolin paint, alkyd resins, and xylenes, but upholding Dr. Fixit.
Shurik Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (Application 101 of 2021) [2023] UGTAT 58 (14 June 2023)
The tribunal held that Ketomac Dandruff Treatment Shampoo is classifiable as a shampoo under HSC 3305.10.00, not as a pharmaceutical product.
Kikagati Power Company Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (Application 55 of 2020) [2023] UGTAT 57 (12 May 2023)
The Tribunal held that Kikagati Power Company’s imported gearbox was classifiable under Heading 8483.40.00, not as a turbine part under Heading 8410.90.
Elgon Hydro Siti Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (Application 125 of 2019) [2022] UGTAT 24 (15 July 2022)
The Tribunal held that imported ball valves for a hydropower project were properly classified under HSC 8481.80.00, but reduced the tax to Shs. 171,059,811.75.
Norbrook Uganda Limited v Uganda Revenue Authority (TAT Application No. 18 of 2018) [2020] UGTAT 5 (15 May 2020)
The Tribunal partly allowed a tax appeal over veterinary products, upholding tax on Alamycin Egg and Chick Formula but vacating assessments on four other products.
