Abdullah v Rex
Abdullah v Rex (Criminal Appeal No. 167 of 1951) [1951] EACA 259 (1 January 1951)
The Court of Appeal held that while the intervention and attack by the complainants' advocate holding a watching brief was ill-advised, ill-timed, and highly irregular, it did not amount to a breach of legal procedure sufficient to vitiate the trial. The Magistrate's judgment indicated that he was not influenced by the remarks until after he had found the appellant guilty. The Court agreed with the High Court that justice was manifestly done and that there was no real likelihood of prejudice against the appellant. The misdirection by the Magistrate regarding the effect of the Bar Council's ru…
Source excerpt
- Trial Fairness
- Professional Conduct Of Advocates
- Prejudice In Criminal Trials
- Cross Examination Etiquette