Rex v Kyononeka and Another (Cr.A 69/1934.)
Rex v Kyononeka and Another (Cr.A 69/1934.) [1937] EACA 151 (1 January 1937)
The Court held that, despite the appellants being charged with the murder of the same person, the fact that they were indicted separately but tried together rendered the proceedings a nullity. The principles of English law, as reflected in section 134 of the Criminal Procedure Code Uganda, require that accused persons be properly joined in the same information for a joint trial. The consent of the accused to the irregular procedure does not cure the jurisdictional defect. Accordingly, the convictions were set aside and a retrial was ordered.
Source excerpt
- Criminal Procedure Code Section 134
- Joint Trial Nullity
- Separate Informations
- Jurisdictional Error